Assessing Different Reform Frameworks
The second phase of our research is now underway. We are currently exploring the implications of abolishing or radically reforming the legal gendering of personhood. This happens in various ways, including through the registering of sex at birth (see our Q &A). Our research is divided into four separate strands.
Implications for sex/gender-specific provision
The first strand is considering what different legal reform frameworks mean for sex/gender-differentiated public and social provision. This topic has received considerable attention in the media recently and tapped into strong feelings and opinions about what role law should play in regulating this field. The Future of Legal Gender project is focusing on three specific areas of sex/gender-differentiated public and social provision, namely: schools; shelters and refuges; and women’s organisations which provide membership and/or services to women.
We are carrying out interviews with education experts/ representatives from relevant education associations, grassroots women’s organisations and providers of protective accommodation, such as shelters and refuges.
Implications for advancing equality
If sex/ gender were no longer a part of legal personhood, what effects, if any, would this have on struggles to advance greater social equality and justice? In asking this question, we are concerned with equality as it relates to sex/ gender, ethnicity/ race, class/ wealth, nationality and disability. We are also concerned with forms of equality that go beyond formally equal treatment. There are many factors that generate unequal lives, and law can have positive or negative consequences for advancing social justice even when it appears on its face to be neutral.
The research in this strand has four main parts:
- The relationship between reforming sex/ gender status and feminist analyses of work, sexuality, socialization, care and violence – particularly how inequalities and exploitation are gendered.
- The potential effects of sex/ gender status reform on other inequalities (including ethnicity, class, nationality, sexuality, and disability).
- The value of frameworks used for other “protected characteristics” (e.g., religion and sexual orientation) for thinking about the reform of legal sex/ gender status.
- The relationship between legislative reform and everyday legal understandings and practices, including those of public bodies and NGOs.
To develop this part of the project, we are undertaking interviews with members of public bodies, such as local authorities, along with NGOs, activists, lawyers and academics.
Implications for the wider public
The third strand is exploring what legal gender status means for the general public, and whether it matters to individuals in their everyday lives. It is also examining attitudes to different legal reform options among different communities.
From October to December 2018, we carried out an on-line survey, to enable a large-scale picture of the issues across different groups to emerge. Over 3,000 people took part. You can see the demographic makeup of respondents here. We are now recruiting participants to audio/visually represent their experiences of gender, and its regulation, in different settings, and to reflect on their experiences through interviews. Participants will include those with and without experiences of gender misrecognition and/or discomfort. We will also be interviewing parents of young children. If you are interested in participating in either way, please click here.
Statutory and administrative implications
This fourth strand is exploring the technical challenges of reforming legal gender across England and Wales. It focuses on the statutory drafting process and the administrative implications of reforming legal gender. We are carrying out interviews with parliamentary drafts people, technical experts in specific areas of law, academics and NGO specialists.